List of contents
- America’s deficencies
- The conspiracy of the high finance
- The US private bank system
- The Black Friday - the background
- Kennedy’s assassination
- September 11 2001
- The vaporization syndrome
- War crimes
- America’s deficencies
- The conspiracy of the high finance
- The US private bank system
- Der schwarze Freitag - Die Hintergründe
- Kennedy’s assassination
- September 11 2001
- The vaporization syndrome
- War crimes
The things that are said in this paragraph could be interpreted as pure anti-Americanism. I reject this idea. Not only because rejecting statements is in. With that, I reveal myself as a citizen that is well adapted to the present customs. And because a defamation of America is not intended.
It is a question of an unbiased view of the state that is still the most powerful one in the world for me. The USA is an empire - the last, but not for much longer. Those who possess only a little bit of criticism will admit that it does not stand well for America. The explanations on this website will prove that.
America is not only the most powerful but also the most unethical country. Both immediately relate to each other. The top position that the USA holds in the horde of nations automatically stimulates all negative individuals to highest immorality and most shameful crimes. In addition, a powerful state is already immoral to an extremely high degree because the power of a state can only be achieved by immoral means. It needs fighting spirit, ruthlessness and malice to reach such a position.
Such a special position is naturally profitable. The world history has seen many empires that seemed invincible at a certain time and that the powerless nations confirm their special position through tributes. But the situation is not like that anymore, as it was before the millennium. America is powerful indeed, but has also powerful opponents. These can destroy the USA by surrendering their own existence. They can do this even after a first preventive stroke against them.
This has resulted in an impasse if the utmost means are utilized. That is not necessarily crucial. Quite the opposite. For the first time in the history of mankind the opposing parties are forced to opt for communication rather than victory. That is a very new situation that we have not learned to deal with. Particularly America is still caught up in completely inappropriate and old ideas.
The situation is as follows: there are nuclear powers that can achive their interests with atomic bombs. And there is the horde of atomic paupers that would love to have nuclear weapons if they were not hindered by the nuclear powers, particularly the USA. One can understand that. If every state had such horror weapons nobody would know who made the bomb explode.
Apparently, the situation is quite clear: on one side we have the nuclear powers, on the other the ones who don’t have any nuclear weapons. If it was a matter of power distribution only, the problem would be solved already. The nuclear powers would reach an agreement and the other ones would have to obey. Otherwise, they would be punished. Yes, if it was only a matter of power. But it is a matter of economy. It is a matter of oil.
The problem is caused because China's economy grows almost explosively while the US economy collapses at same rate. With the economy also China's thirst for oil increases. China definitely has an advantage in terms of payment. They hold onto the money. On the other hand, things aren‘t looking too good for the USA. The US foreign trade deficit currently amounts to 800 thousand million dollars per annum. It is foreseeable when the US money system and economy will collapse.
In spite of that, America thinks to have a right to extensively waste oil. They think they are allowed to exploit all the Gulf States even more down to their whim. China with its rapidly increasing demand for oil must fight this. When the USA do not fulfill China’s wishes, China, for starters, sells its atomic missiles to North Korea and at Pakistan for them to test. When the situation requires they sell it to Iran, maybe also to South Africa, Argentina or Brazil.
Then we have the exact situation that America was trying to avoid since the detonation of the first atomic bombs over Japan: The world’s predator’s teeth are broken out if its mouth. The US’ old virtues like rapacity, shiftiness and thirst for revenge do not help now. Now a will to strike an agreement is crucial. That will be a very new experience for America.
In order to illustrate the anomalies in America a little more drastically, I would like to add a small dialog that I wrote as part of a novel. The text is a diary entry of the novel’s heroine Laura. She goes for a walk around the Alster in Hamburg with her half-brother Georg. Here is the text:
In order to begin a conversation, as I did not want us to walk together silently, I asked him randomly: "Tell me, how do you get along with your compatriots?" -"In what way?" - "Well, politically and economically. Do you share the general opinions of people there or are you fed up with the whole thing"? Georg thought about this for a while, then he said: "I am American and therefore I support my country."
"Oh really", I said, "that is also a kind of answer. You mean that if you belong to a state you must therefore approve its greatest villainous deeds." - "Not necessarily, however America has not committed any villainous deeds and so I can fully stand up for this country." I said: "Good for you. You have a leader, sorry, a president who acts with kindness and wisdom for his nation and all other nations."
"I have a feeling that you try to drag America through the mud", Georg said, "if that is your goal, we can finish our walk immediately. I have no interest in such conversation anyway." - "But Georg, we are siblings that have a certain sympathy for each other. Nevertheless we should be able to also handle tricky questions that concern each others native country with the necessary sensitiveness. From my side there won’t be any insults. That I promise you."
Georg backed down. "Well", he said, "we can discuss whether America is ideal in all fields or not. In any case, it is a country that was created by God for the welfare of the nations." - "You said that wonderfully, Georg, I admire you for that, you and your America. There are not many nations that can claim something in such a marvelous way."
Georg still felt like he was led up the garden path. Therefore he shouted: "Well then, put forward your arguments against America, if you have any. I am listening"! Now, I did not want to pick a quarrel. I only wanted to find out how he thought about America’s special actions and ideas. Therefore I said: "Strictly speaking, I do not have such arguments, I only have questions and hope that you will answer them."
He closed his eyes tightly. I went on: "What do you think, for example, about your environmental protection. Al Gore wrote books about this topic - „Ways for the Balance“ and „An Inconvenient Truth“ - in which he lamented the absolute disinterest of the Americans in this field. He said they regarded his engagement as a whim, something that damages the businesses and therefore is bad. America then also voted against every convention for the protection of nature in the environmental conferences."
Georg: "We produce so much environmental toxins because we manufacture so many products for other nations." - "That is not right because America’s export is not that great at all. Germany is the world champion of export and still only produces a fraction of the pollution that America causes. No, it is the wastefulness and the insane military armament that force up the pollutionproduction."
Georg: "We are the world police. We need the military and the armament in order to safeguard the world peace." - "The question is only whether the other states in the world agree with that. Police is not always a blessing. There are police states in which police exercise only terror and suppression. What do you think, Georg? Do the other nations welcome America as a world police"?
Georg: "The Arabian or Muslim rogue states certainly don’t. And Russia and China are already against us because they envy us for our position in the world." - "I guess that India only got atomic bombs because they do not want to rely on America’s police power. Therefore, one can hardly speak of America as the world police anymore."
Georg: "We are the only power on earth that combats terrorism in a sustainable way. And therefore we are the only legitimate state police."
I: "Have you ever thought about why there actually is terrorism? I mean the terrorists play a dangerous game. Every one of them must be prepared to be killed in an attack or identified as a culprit and be punished. That is some kind of aggressive martyrdom in my eyes. Therefore, dear Georg, why do they do it? Are they stupid or what?"
Georg: "They are simply just fanatic. That explains everything." - "Excuse me, that does not explain anything at all in my eyes. Fanaticism as a result of religious delusion? That explanation is too simple for me. There are terrorists who are not religiously motivated in any way. No, terrorism is the result of an economical or military suppression. The resulting indignation drives the youth into terrorism."
Georg: "You mean that we are to blame that terrorism spreads so rapidly." - "You can call it waht you want. I call what America does to other countries of the world terrorism of nations. America, that is no state, it is a bunch of thieves"! - "That is strong"! - "That is the only possible name for America and the terror practiced by America against other states."
Georg: "If we act in this way, then only out of absolute necessity." - "What terror actions can be considered necessary. The greatest crimes are justified with such necessities today. Not only America’s." He: "We are a free country and define our necessities ourselves"!
I looked at my brother astonished: „My impression is that American people feel like a special and better kind of human being. I believe that they were inoculated by the state with those ideas. On the basis of these elite ideas it is easy for them to commit politically motivated crimes or to accept them. The main thing is that America benefits. For the nations that means: They must protect themselves against America like against a wild animal.
But at some point the states will revolt, they simply will not put up with that any longer. They will say: America, no thank you! Then all people will recognize that you became the world police without the mandate of the community of nations. This pretentiousness must have an end. We can manage things by ourselves. At the same time when poor and unconscious nations do not have to fear the American power anymore, this state will collapse like a house of cards.“
Georg: "We will not go under, we will conquer our opponents at last"! - "You only think in the categories victory and defeat, like most Americans. In this case it is a question only of live or death in the near future.
If your president keeps throwing money down the drain for military armament - $400 thousand are planned for million military costs this year - then the American economy will collapse and cannot be saved by anyone. Not even by the mineral oil stolen in interventions.
Georg: "I do not see the situation like this." - "But I do! The dollar lost a third of its value within two years compared to the euro. Those losses clearly indicate America’s decline and fall. If America continues in that way, it will get the shock of a lifetime. Because the present course is only maintained by buying up gigantic amounts of dollars from Europe and Asia. Things can’t go on like this. At some point this will come to an end. I do want to imagine what will happen then.
If one dares to associate the events around the death of John F. Kennedy or of the 11th September 2001 with the machinations of the high finance in a private round, then one will almost certainly hear: "Yes, yes, the conspiracy theory!" With that the conversation is finished for the dialog partner. He probably thinks that this would be a sufficient argument to end the discussion early.
Such polemics is no argumentation but an admission of prejudices which is based on a lazy way of thinking at most. This remembers me of an event that I was allowed to become a witness of. It concerned an otherwise very engaged young man who had a few drinks too many that evening.
This student now had the intention of giving his head a little refreshment. He therefore put his head under the faucet. But how one can be mistaken. It was not cold but boiling hot water that came out of it. Instead of instantly pulling his head away from the faucet, he yelled with pain. It was grotesque. It was only when us bystanders realized that he was too drunk for any practical action of his own, we pulled him away from under the faucet.
The majority of fellow citizens behave just like that when it comes to politics. Instead of opposing those who bring ruin and demanding respectable living conditions from them they whimper as if condemned to motionlessness. They think they are not able to defend themselves against the evil. They still elect the parties that only strive to speed up the downwards trend.
Now the conspiracy. Is it is in fact only a catchword, or does it validly characterize the present situation? As I will describe in the next chapter there was in fact a conspiracy. The beginning was made when the American bank system was created. But that was a long time ago. But what was begun at that time is still highly effective.
What happens today, however, has only little conspiratorial character. One simply meets somewhere, has a chat and casually decides that the World Trade Center should be scrapped. There were good reasons to do that. And concerning the legality of those actions - it completely depends on the perspective. If one thinks of oneself as the inner government of the world, and they do this, then the legality is guaranteed.
And then: The governments of all other countries do not do anything different in a corresponding situation. But a crime does not become greater or smaller because it is not committed by a political representative but of a member of the high finance. These people always think they are free from any law of morality.
I have already known for a long time that the US finance system is privately organized. So I thought that the central bank also works without the patronage of the state. Only slowly I began to understand that America surrendered to a crowd of egoistical bankers who are up for any atrocities by having this system. These people look, first and foremost, after their own interests. Only in order to preserve the outward appearance, they, half-heartedly, have the public welfare in mind.
It was mainly two books caught my interest in these topics and that I obtained my knowledge from in the beginning. One was "The Insiders" by Gary Allen, which connected precise investigations about the economic development of the last 100 years with the crazy conclusion that the western high finance and communism were connected with each other through a secret cooperation.
The other book was an offprint with the title: "The banker conspiracy - The seizure of power by the high finance and its results" from Eustace Mullins and Roland Bohlinger. As described on the cover, an explosive work of deciphering and disclosures. Those books were of course only the most important works that delivered the basic knowledge about the villainous deeds of the high finance to me.
I want to try and present the disastrous development in a short survey. The development is that the power moved from politics to economy, thus from the politicians to the bosses of economy. In this case it was a German who came up with the original idea of bad machination.
In the 18th century there was a German philosopher called Adam Weishaupt who founded the Illuminated Order on 1st May 1776. It was an esoteric community that strove for mystic inspiration. In spite of all its mysticism this secret society replicated in its structure the Society of Jesus and had relationships to the Masonic lodge. Aim of the order was world control with the aid of a conspiracy, if necessary under a reign of terror.
The developed constructions were taken up by the gold and brilliant tycoon Cecil Rhodes a hundred years later. He dreamed about the extension of the English domination across the whole world. The objective was the foundation of such a great power that after that every war was made impossible. And the promotion of humanity. The way he understood it!
The concept was marked by a unique national arrogance and political-criminal will for power. A country that has maybe one percent of the world’s population claimed to decide the destiny of mankind. The installation of a by England controlled, all overcoming power would already cause a world war compared to which the terrors of the Second World War would appear as the biggest flop of the year.
Cecil Rhodes accepted such risks. He persistently pursued his goal, the creation of a new world order. He lavishly distributed his personal earnings of one million pounds per year for his conspiratorial purposes, of convincing persuasive power. He then described his specific ideas in seven testaments.
Now one usually bandies their political ideas about through publications. Not so Rhodes. This specialist for conspiracies wanted to operate from the underground. By testament! Of course the testaments became known nevertheless at some point. In the first testament he explained his worldwide goals, in the seventh testament he got the Rhodes scholarship on track.
And then there was still the third testament in which Rhodes left his whole assets to Lord Rothschild. That was his financier in the mining company. A covering letter came with it that contained the written substance of what they discussed. So the postscript states: "With regards to the indicated questions you will take the constitution of the Jesuits, if obtainable."
Rothschild was removed from the front line of the secret society strategic reasons and was replaced by Lord Rosebury. Financed with Rhodes money the Round-Table-Group was founded which decisively influenced the English government’s foreign policy during the First World War.
When the war was over the main actors wanted to get down to action at last. England and France had so far been the target countries of their activities, now they included America as a most promising field. Front organizations were founded. In the English colonies the Royalist Institutes for International Matters RIIA, in America the Relations Council on Foreign CFR. Central organization, however, remained the Round-Table-Group.
America’s most important finance dynasties were present at the foundation, including Morgan and Rockefeller and also the clans Kuhn-Loeb, Dillon Read, Brown bros. Harryman. Further founder members were J. Schiff, F. Vanderlipp, N. Aldrich, B. Baruch, P. Warburg.
The CFR is said to have become known, at least in informed circles, as "The Establishment", "The invisible government" or also as "The ministry Rockefeller for foreign affairs." It was known to the public certainly as an organization. But it was a secret that this organization was up to no good.
The CFR has its seat in New York City’s 68th street. It is probably America’s most influential semipublic organization in the field of foreign affairs. It counts close to 1500 official members that all made a name for themselves in the government, business circles, investigation etc.. In spite of that, the organization is virtually unknown to the American public at large.
Gary Allen claims that he was only able to find one article in spite of eager enquiries about the CFR. This article was published in Harpers which is hardly a mass-circulation paper. The article in Harpers had the descriptive heading: School for statesmen. Very suitably selected because there and only there the people who were later to be the puppet master later in government were trained
I must say, however, that I myself had already known before about the existence of the CFR from an article in "The best of Readers Digest". There it was said that in the concerning building in New York more billionaires were regular visitors than anywhere else on the earth.
Of course it was not mentioned there that almost half of its employees or members were asked at some point to hold a position in government or to be active there as a consultant. According to the ideas of the CFR, this practice is completely justified. Because its members unite a passionate concern about the direction of the American foreign policy, so they say.
And this then climbs across millions of corpses. So it was due to the influence of the CFR that Hitler’s seizure of power was financed and that his wars were not stopped right in the beginning. Also the Russian October revolution and therefore the communists’ seizure of power in Russia was financed by the CFR. Both with the assistance of the Warburgs."
Without the Warburg family the following event would not have been possible. They were virtually involved in all actions of the Round-Table-Group and the CFR. One, however, gets the impression that the Warburg’s were not the real initiators of the racketeering.
They were more like the managers of the disaster that was hatched and ordered by the real powerbrokers. They did the dirty job but also mostly the mental work for people who didn’t care in what way they would reach their aims and who only wanted that their fortune was permanently fixed and increased. And the Warburg’s made excellent helpers for that aim.
Especially Paul Warburg who was born in Germany should render a service of enormous consequence to the CFR. He himself invented a construction that, despite of its malignancy, has to be called brilliant: The privately managed money economy that freed itself from all state control.
Anselm Rothschild, prime father of all finance manipulations, had already said: “Give me the authorizations of a central bank; then I will not worry about the legislator." That was what the high finance required from Paul Warburg: a construction that put the right for the creation and annihilation of money in America into their hands. With that they could practically control every public activity.
The high finance even supplied the reason for their great coup themselves. As a foretaste of what they would put into operation on Black Friday once again, but then thoroughly. Paul Warburg was also in on that. The panic of 1907 was instigated there. In this case rumors were broadcasted by Morgan that claimed the insolvency of the Knickerbocker Bank and the Trust Company of America.
The American public demanded measures from the government to prevent such panic situations. It was then that Morgan and P. Warburg offered to protect the American finance system against such finance disasters with the aid of a central bank. They did not say however that this would set the fox to keep the geese.
Paul Warburg played the most important role in drawing up this new bank system for America. I believe that it is very interesting to pay a little attention to this specialist in finance businesses’ family.
First of all we need to mention Paul Warburg and his brother Felix who immigrated to America from Germany in 1902. Their brother Max remained in Germany and should later become the main money lender for the Bolsheviks in the October revolution. Paul married Nina Loeb, the daughter of Solomon Loeb of Kuhn-Loeb and Felix married Frieda Schiff, daughter of Jakob Schiff, ruler of the bank house Kuhn-Loeb. The Schiff’s were not just anybody. In the 18th century they shared a double company with the Rothschild’s.
In order to understand how America could accept the construction of a bank system that was privately controlled by a few super rich and freed itself from any state control, one must, like it or not, go into the American beliefs. Because after the creation of this system the total servitude of the American nation was ultimately sealed by the high finance.
It was probably the effects of the Calvinism that set the decisive points for this disastrous development. Calvin, who for America represents something like the prophet Mohammed for the Islam, had an idea of morality that can only be described as dreadful or criminal. If you will pardon my saying so: what of the things forbidden by him is directed against God?
Despite ostracizing dice, pub visits, luxury consumption, theater, jewelry and laces he allowed lending money for adequate interests. But that is not all. A useful job was desired. If the money is multiplied through that it is a sign of being chosen by God. Well, if that is not a reason to fire away and to really show the nation how Calvinists act as capitalists.
Through that a state of mind developed in America that regularizes actions that don’t hurt anyone through restrictive laws. On the other hand, activities that strongly effect the population are not made a punishable offence.
Americans idolize the idea of freedom. Probable because the first immigrants knew the negative sides of the European monarchies and opposed this regiment very much. Well-founded refusal of an aspect does not mean that the negation of the aspect is correct. If I lift all of society’s restrictions, I allow blood and thunder in an extreme case, in a less extreme case the total exploitation of the masses through a minority.
America draws its identity from the existence of its constitution in which the separation of powers is defined as the method which can repulse all the state endangering security attacks. But this weapon has become blunt, if not even unsuitable. The power of the high finance is so great that they are able to manipulate every of the three powers in any chosen way.
Already at that time, the American voters let the press lead them up the garden path. One only had to play one’s cards well enough. Paul Warburg showed the way to the high finance. When the new bank system was drawn up, all leading men were present and the meeting wore signs of a conspiratorial conference.
It was the evening of 22.11.1910 at the railway station in Hoboken, New Jersey. A number of reporters from the most respected newspapers in New York had come because they had found out that members of exclusive financial circles would arrive here and leave together at this time.
It happened as expected. First was Senator Nelson Aldrich, one of the senate’s five most dominating senators with connections to the rubber and tobacco trust. Then came Frank Vanderlip, president of the National City Bank which belonged to the banking house of Kuhn Loeb Co and represented the interests of Rockefeller. With him came Henry P. Davison, senior partner of the J. P. Morgan Company and Charles D. Norton, president of the Morgan’s First National City Bank.
All these men that controlled oil, railroads, communications and the heavy industry were unable to provide a reason for the common ride in Aldrich’s railway car. Only Vanderlip declared to a reporter that they intended to spend an undisturbed weekend together in the country.
They all disappeared in Aldrich’s special railway car one of which had already got the curtains closed to protect against curious eyes. Then Paul Warburg arrived. Who after only eight years at Kuhn Loeb Co already received an annual salary of half a million dollars. In meetings of the chamber of commerce or banker groups his lectures raised a great cheer. He was called the bank brain of New York.
When the train had left the railway station Hoboken, the reporters had virtually found out nothing. And not even the fact that a great number of top class money people had left together with an unknown destination was mentioned in New York’s daily papers. So one can see that the American press was already completely controlled by the capital.
The ride went on for about a thousand miles to Jekyll Island in the state of Georgia. There was the Jekyll Island Hunt Club, an exclusive and remote hunting club that belonged to Morgan and some New York bankers. In the case of secret meetings like this, the members were informed that the club was used in another way and it could not be used by them.
This time, the meeting of the finance people was so secret that one had even exchanged the staff. In addition it had been arranged that the participants of the conference would only address each other with their first names. Why all the secrets? The control of America’s future monetary and lending system was to be newly regulated by the congress. If a decision would be made against the New York high finance, their power would have been broken. That was not allowed to happen.
Paul Warburg thought of the future central bank in this way: It would be the property of private people who would make profit by shareholding. It would be authorized to control the national economy’s money circulation. It would have the right of disposal for all public funds. It could prompt the government to enter wars in order to achieve their economical interests if need be.
Such power agglomeration in the hand of the capital that therefore dominates the power of politics and pushes it into the second line creates a form of rule that is generally called plutocracy. That was their real goal!
Warburg had still succeeded in establishing a homogeneous discount rate for the whole of America in the Federal-Reserve-Act. With that the possibility of purposefully causing a panic like the one in 1907 through an abrupt change of discount rate was created. The established high finance now had it in their hands to put unpopular competitors for the power in the banking system out of the running by driving their opponents into bankruptcy.
Of course none of that went public. Only after the former actors had retired and things lay in the rosy past, one could make sense of what had happened at the Jekyll Hunt Club from the partial reports of the late gossips.
Paul Warburg was very clearly superior to the other ones when it came to constructive potency. He also had the right feeling for what can be put through politically. The participants of the meeting accepted all he found necessary for the function of a privately controlled banking system. Only the name Federal-Reserve-System for the banking system was refused and replaced by the name Aldrich-Law which Aldrich‘s instigated.
Because the Americans associated Aldrich with the machinations of Wall Street, the congress at first failed the beautiful new law as predicted by Warburg. It first had to be made appealing to the population in a laborious propaganda campaign after which it in fact took the hurdle of legislation.
With that a way was cleared that led to the incapacitation of the president and thus the government. Because it only depended on the Federal-Reserve-Board whether the economy flourished or fell into stagnation or recession. The threat of making the economy collapse could tenderize every president.
The power of the high finance was now so great that it easily exceeded the power of the president. How should he be able to defend himself against their decisions. So he was forced to ignore the congress’ decisions or to announce his decisions without waiting for their decisions if necessary. All according to the behest of the high finance. That meant the abolition of the constitution!
This id for sure: Since the creation of the Federal-Reserve-System, America was no longer a democracy. The insiders of the rich and powerful determine who is put forward as a presidential candidate in the two competing parties.
Who really gets elected is completely unimportant to the insider shaft. Once the president is elected he is controlled in their sense. When he does not cooperates in a suitable manner he is involved, like Clinton, in a sex scandal or, like John F. Kennedy, is killed by stooges of the monetary power.
The senators’ condition is not any better. As it is necessary for them to lead their election campaign with the aid of the media they are highly dependent on the media owners who impose their opinion on them. Those who attack the capital end their careers when the new elections come up at the latest.
By the way: The Federal-Reserve-Board took over Paul Warburg so that the money mafia’s finance businesses were directed onto the right track straight from the beginning. It should become a tradition to put equivalent American men into this position.
So all preparations were made to let the great economic collapse of the Black Friday happen. Now, no depression can be artificially caused if the economy is healthy in itself. The illness of an economy is the unjust distribution of goods between the rich and poor. This results in an insolvency of the masses which brings about the devaluation of the capital.
The decisive point of the Black Friday was to let the inevitable annihilation of great amounts of capital occur purposeful and to the own advantage. Through the installation of the new banking system, the insiders of the capital received the exact instruments they needed for their dirty intentions.
The motivation for the flagrant crime they put into operation was rescuing the own fortune and tantamount the elimination of the grown competition. When the battle was fought, Rothschild and Rockefeller, the initiators of the event, had not only conserved their fortune but also extended it at the expense of the competition and the masses.
Gary Allen says: "The method of producing alternating inflation and deflation with the help of a central bank and to so cut up the profits of the population has been elaborated to an exact science by the international bankers."
The two main actors, Rothschild and Rockefeller, got down to action. The volume of money in the American economy was increased by 62 percent between 1923 and 1929. Mainly to bring the stock exchange quotations to enormous rates. And the population was seduced by the speculation - through newspaper reports that promised heaven on earth.
Finally, it could begin. The bomb was ignited. On 6th February 1929 the governor of the Bank of England, Montagu Norman, came to Washington in order to confer with the finance experts there. Norman was a close confidant of Morgan, therefore the right person in the right place for the starting signal. Immediately after his departure, the Federal-Reserve-Board increased the discount rate.
Therefore at one go, the money borrowed with small interests for the speculation became so expensive that it forced the speculators to sell their stock for any price they could get. Supporting the effect, the insider’s financiers demanded the 24-hour loans back. So people had to sell additional stock in order to be able to cash these loans.
By the way, the finance group around Rothschild and Rockefeller had shortly before that sold all stock that was threatened to get caught up in the stock exchange crash with considerable profit. That additionally increased the pressure on the stock exchange quotations.
The result of all these manipulations was that the stock exchange quotations fell in an abnormal way. Presumably, all was planned this way. Those who had sold their stock in time could buy this back later at 10 % of the former value. That was the real motive for Rothschild and Rockefeller to cause a disaster of such a great extent for America and mankind.
Gary Allen comments: "To believe that the scientifically constructed breakdown of 1929 was a misfortune or the result of stupidity defies any logic. The international bankers that supported the inflationary measures and practiced the propaganda that pumped up the stock exchange represented too many generations of accumulated expert knowledge that they could ever have stumbled into the great crisis by chance."
And Louis Mc Fadden, chairman of the currency committee and member of congress, said: "The crisis was not an accident. It was a carefully worked out event... The international bankers were striving to cause a state of the despair so that they could lift themselves above us all as our masters."
The capital insiders of course also became active in the political field. Malicious tongues claim that they instigated the two world wars. It is for sure that America’s participation in the world wars has to be accredited to them. So in 1916 Woodrow Wilson promised in his election campaign that he would keep America out of the war in Europe.
Just after he had won the elections, he turned by 180 degrees and forced America into the war. As it should later became known, he had already made the agreements with England that would force America into the world war. This happened with the aid of Colonel House who notoriously shaped the Round-Table-Syndicate. The entire federal-reserve-clique wanted it that way.
They pretended to avenge the sinking of the Lusitania that had been sunk by a German submarine boat. After all, the Lusitania had three thousand tons of ammunition in its cargo holds. Not the sinking of the ship through the Germans was criminal but that passengers were on board of the ship. Taking passengers on board of a warship was no problem for Morgan.
He and the other insiders wanted to make a killing with the aid of the war industry. So Bernard Baruch was appointed by President Wilson to be the chairman of the office for war industry. He made a profit of 200 million dollars for himself alone. His combatants in the exploitation of the American nation were not any less unassuming. The First World War proved to be an excellent business for the high finance, particularly for Rothschild’s and Rockefeller’s.
Winston Churchill once said that it would have been better if America had not intervened in the world war. Europe would have been spared the fascism in Italy, the National Socialism in Germany and the communism in Russia.
I would like to add: With the here collected facts we probably found the main rascals of the last one hundred years. In this agglomeration of criminal energies, Stalin and Hitler are only the real puppet master’s accomplices. Because after all, the money mafia financed the rise of those two dictators. They would not have done that without ulterior motives"!
One can see that the evil is always there and everywhere, especially where there are hardly any boundaries for its development of power. We can only hope for society that people will be fed up with them at some point and will send them packing.
When the world was informed about the assassination of John F. Kennedy, I couldn’t imagine why someone would kill this person. Certainly, he was playing with fire in the Cuba conflict which could have easily grown into the world’s annihilation. At that time I was still convinced of America’s fundamental honesty. Therefore I believed the official announcement that blamed everything on the communists without further ado.
At that time I still regarded America as the country of hope. Therefore I was not surprised that once was arrested after the action as the murderer of Kennedy. I expected that there was sufficient evidence for Oswald’s involvement in the offence. I had no idea that Oswald had to take a nitrate test which then proved that he had not fired any weapons in the last 24 hours.
In a proper investigation this would have lead to Oswald’s release and an extensive research would have been taken of. Nothing the like happened. Indeed there was the Warren-commission which was supposed to solve Kennedy’s death. But it obviously only the one explained goal to keep the true culprits free of a criminal prosecution.
At first the commission was successful. Because it was made up of seven members each of the Senate and the House of Representatives who were all regarded as honorable members of their guild. However, when Jim Garrison, the responsible public prosecutor of the New Orleans district, looked through the commission’s results he stated that the investigation was frowsy and unprofessional, disorderly and confused.
The commission had not even added a tidy evidence list. There was a great number of promising traces none of which had been followed. And it appeared most serious to Garrison that the conclusions were founded on a very restricted selection of evidence. One simply brushed a great number of credible testimonies under the carpet.
Garrison found out that the commission basically started from the idea that Kennedy was shot from behind. That was basically an untouchable fact. However, Garrison found out that the statements of numerous witnesses at the Dealey Plaza contradicted this idea. If the Warren commission denied the truth so vehemently at this point, there must be a motive.
Garrison found out that the commission basically started from the idea that Kennedy was shot from behind. That was basically an untouchable fact. However, Garrison found out that the statements of numerous witnesses at the Dealey Plaza contradicted this idea. If the Warren commission denied the truth so vehemently at this point, there must be a motive.
The determination of the fatal shot’s direction was therefore the sore point that threatened to shake the whole official building of lies. And as luck would have it, the first determination had not occurred system-consistently.
For it was not something that can be planned from the beginning. One could not go to the Dallas state institutions the day before and say: „Hi guys! If Kennedy is murdered tomorrow, then take his head, stuff it into a shredder and throw it into the canalization. Nevertheless that would have been really close to the bone.
So it happened that the responsible medical officer carried out an autopsy of Kennedy’s corpse. He put the President’s brain into formalin. After the brain had stiffened, the direction from which the fatal shots came could have been determined.
But an incredible thing happened: Kennedy’s brain disappeared without a trace. It simply vanished into thin air. And the pathologist who led Kennedy’s autopsy burned the first issue of the autopsy report at home in his fireplace. Because this is the covering of a criminal action, he would not have done this without force. One can assume that much.
But there was another factual piece of evidence. An eyewitness named Zaprunder had filmed the event and handed over the film to the journal Life. This film was hidden in a safe by the journal for five years. It is clear that a newspaper publisher misses out on the publication of such delicacy only if the utmost pressure is put on the management.
So all direct pieces of evidence were removed. There still remained the talkative eyewitnesses and confidants. It was made short work of those ones. Those who talked a little too much were eliminated very quickly. A hundred people were released from their testimony duty that way.
First of all Lee Oswald himself. That’s just what they would have needed that he had understood that his head was on the line and that he should give up all he knew about the conspiracy at all costs. At least he knew names. Because we cannot assume that he was suspected to be the gunman just accidentally.
That he was sitting there during the attack in shooting position was considered a small, fine diversionary tactic. No more. That was supposed to be used against him now. Therefore he would testify. However, they didn’t let it come that far. Jack Ruby, one of the conspiracy party, shot Oswald in front of live camera in the cellar of a police station in Dallas. He himself was shot dead shortly after.
So all who could have shed some light on the conspiracy were either eliminated or silenced by threat or bribery. Especially those who knew the score but didn’t comment on the situation make us suspect the whole scale of the Kennedy conspiracy. Because for every murdered confidant there was certainly a dozen other people that knew the score but also knew that they were not allowed to give away anything without threatening their life.
Jim Garrison then came to the conclusion that an exile Cuban’s conspiracy was behind Kennedy’s assassination. This may be correct for the direct handling of the assassination. But the Cubans did not act in their initiative. If that had been the case the whole affair would have been revealed much earlier. Because a complicity like this one would have never existed between the American authorities and the exile Cubans.
However all state authorities were in on it to hush up the events. The Dallas police immediately closed the case after the death of the probable assassin Oswald. The FBI accepted this procedure and filed the case after a few weeks. Finally, the Warren commission confirmed the police’s and FBI’s investigation results just under 10 months later.
The only one who poked around some more in the pile of dirt was Jim Garrison. He came to the conclusion that it was a conspiracy of the CIA and exile Cubans that led to Kennedy’s calculated assassination. In his opinion the motive for the murder was Kennedy’s politics of reducing tension. This conclusion may suggest itself but is, however, wrong.
Both the CIA and the Cubans did not have any influence on the newspaper’s publications. That can be taken as a starting point. And the manipulation of the police and the forensic medicine cannot be managed by the American secret service alone. That would mean that America is absolutely dependent on its secret service. That is surely not the case. Because that would be a dictatorship.
Since the government cannot be behind the murder, only the real power in the USA is left. That is the group of billionaires at Wall Street. Only they are equipped with the instruments of power that make it impossible for any citizen of the country to bring these people to justice. Tripartition of the democratic powers does not exist for this mafia group because they completely dominate each of the powers.
As Wall Street is very likely to have ordered Kennedy’s murder the question is for what reason this ultimately high risk undertaking was started. It is very unlikely that it was Kennedy’s politics that were focused on easing tension. It may be possible to deceive the public over years and decades regarding the puppet masters of the conspiracy.
However, there are weak points in all conspiracies that will sooner or later reveal the true state of affairs. One would not have accepted this risk just because of politics that could well turn into the opposite with the next president. No, it must have been something extreme, a threat to the existence of Wall Street, that made America’s finance gentlemen commit a crime of this scale.
Only recently, the facts that actually determined the events came to light. And that made the whole events transparent in a crystal-clear way. It was a question of the continued existence of the US’ privately managed money economy. What had cost the American state trillions of dollars was supposed to be overruled by a presidential document. The "executive order number 11110" was supposed to replace the former document "executive order number 10289". An earthquake!
This presidential decision authorized the President of the United States to bring the production of banknotes back into the power of the state again! The document was signed on 04 June 1963. The signing of this presidential decision would have broken the Wall Street’s power. And it would have stopped their gigantic money influx from the American nation’s budget.
This decision was identical to a self-selected death sentence for John F. Kennedy. Because Wall Street could not approve to simply lose their most important financial influx because of a simple American President. That could not be allowed.
The President’s father saw it the same way. An employee eavesdropped on the President’s conversation with his father Joseph Kennedy in the White House. The employee heard how the father screamed at his son John: "If you do that, they will kill you!" She testified this on oath in a later hearing in congress.
Obviously John F. Kennedy did not let his father change his mind. He had already started to print the new state money under the denotation "United States Notes" and to bring it into circulation. There were 4 billion dollars in 2 and 5 dollar coins. And 10 and 20 dollar bills were prepared in the state’s printing press and were supposed to be put into immediately circulation.
When Kennedy was murdered, the new notes which were still in the state’s printing press were completely destroyed by the twelve private banks that ran the central banks’ business. Notes that had already been distributed were withdrawn from circulation and exchanged for normal money. This is the proof that Kennedy’s murder was incited by the finance mafia.
Bibliography: Springs: Jim Garrison - Who shot John F. Kennedy - ISBN: 3-404-13412-5
Benjes, Hermann (2003) - Who is afraid of Silvio Gesell? - ISBN: 300 000 2049
A few hours before the World Trade Center collapsed in New York a friend called me up from Berlin. He said today would be a special day because 20 years ago the president’s palace in Chile was attacked by Pinochet’s hordes. Osama bin Laden had played an important role in this because he had been active for the Americans.
When the information about the destruction of the Twin Towers was all over the news, I actually wondered whether Osama bin Laden had had a finger in the pie. That was only an idea. The American secret service, however, obviously also had the same idea. Just a few hours after the collapse of the towers it was made public that there was irrefutable proof that Osama Bin Laden committed this offence.
How can that be? I thought. The American secret service is sleeping quietly and restfully for years, not having a presentiment of evil and also not bothering any possible assassins. And the moment a disgraceful business happens, they wake up with a jump from their deep sleep, orientate themselves quickly, catch the scent and the very next minute they have discovered the one true culprit.
Wow! This is how a secret service must function, like this and no other way. The people of Mossad, who probably are the most efficient, would have certainly seen the dentures fall out of their faces. They could have only been amazed how a secret service works in perfection. And all that under extremely complicated conditions!
Because the police made an enormous fuss. The airspace over half of America was closed and no one was let out of New York. The whole action was designed as a gigantic mousetrap. Nothing worked anymore. It was a headless or headless making reaction of the public authority. What happened was a panic. And, as I recognized later, that was very lucrative for certain billionaires.
An inexplicable uneasiness crept up inside me when I found out more details. By the chaos that was caused by the government, especially in aviation, up to 15 billion dollars were made. The winners were those who were actually regarded as the victims of the attack on the WTC. Somehow that didn’t match in any way with the picture that the government and press spread of the attacks.
But what should one do. The picture of the airplanes crashing into the towers was so convincingly insistent that one could not do anything but accept the official announcements. Even though a well-known flight expert described it as almost impossibly that inexperienced terrorists fly such big airplanes into the towers. And then even two airplanes shortly after each other. He thought there would only be a handful pilots in the world that were able to do something like that.
And then I got a book about the topic: Operation 9/11 by Gerhard Wisnewski. After I had finished it, it was clear to me that the destruction of the Twin Towers represented a parallel to Kennedy’s murder. Apparently both actions happened under existential compulsion and both were realized with criminal power of the same measure.
First of all I found out that the material that was presented in the book were a gigantic crowd of internet users’ contributions. This was obviously the most important difference of the events compared to Kennedy’s murder. Everything was spread - in million fold intensity. Murdering some of the authors was senseless. For every contribution a thousand people could be the author.
That is the problem with the new internet medium. Once a topic has arrived in a larger group, one cannot catch or liquidate the people at all. There are simply too many. One had not taken that into account when deciding the destruction of the WTC. And with such a great number of people investigating, secrets do not remain secret for long and inconsistencies and contradictions will not remain hidden long either.
The thing that particularly and straight away caught my eye was that the period of time in which the four terrorist airplanes were able to circle undisturbed in safety regions of the airspace was almost 2 hours. Because New York and the terrain around the pentagon belong to the areas that people must not fly over arbitrarily due to national interests. If an identification code is not consistent or an airplane disappears from the radar screen in this area, all hell breaks loose immediately and straight away.
Within three minutes the fighter jets will have left and will inspect the dubious objects. They will fly in one meter distance to the conspicuous airplane and will virtually force it onto the course announced by them. That is not a game and every pilot of airplanes knows that. They have ways and means to force every plane or even giant aircrafts into a certain direction.
The significant data for the flights of the four crashed airplanes is:
American Airlines 11: Start 7.59 loss of control 8.13 impact in north tower 8.45
United Airlines 175: Start 8.14 loss of control 8.42 impact in south tower 9.03
American Airlines 77: Start 8.20 loss of control 8.46 impact in Pentagon 9.40
American Airlines 93: Start 8.42 loss of control 9.16 impact in Shanksville 10.03
What attracted my attention in this case was that the reaction time for the responsible authorities, that is the time that passed between the loss of control until the impact of the machine, and therefore the time that was availably from there on for an intervention or at least a reaction, was very long. For the machines determined for the WTC it amounted to 32 and 21 minutes. Still 18 minutes passed between the impact in the north tower and that in the south tower.
Imagine that! Three giant aircrafts disappear from the radar screens within 20 minutes and the reaction of the authorities is zero, introduced measures: nothing. And even after the north tower was hit and further two airplanes had gotten out of control, still no measures were taken. 18 minutes passed between the two hits of the WTC in which no move was made to at least clarify the situation.
So if intercontinental atomic missiles would turn up in America, maybe sent on its pernicious way as cruise missiles, how does one want to prevent the impact in any city with such defense that obviously does not exist? The means of deterrence does not work. For it cannot to be known in any way which country the missile came from.
Does one now want to bombard all countries that come into consideration with atomic bombs? Either the four hundred thousand million dollars that are invested into military affairs every year were utilized very badly or the easiest surveillance methods were not used. Or, which is much more likely, the surveillance was cut off purposefully and with consideration.
When I was that far, I separately looked at the individual terror acts. Because I had already noticed that when examining the closer circumstances, I would find inconsistencies and impossibilities in abundance in every attack. Therefore it was impossible to not go about this in a sophisticated way. We will start with the attack on the WTC.
Wisnewski writes under the heading: "a mosquito versus an elephant": "Could an airplane have made one of the WTC towers collapse? Specialists don’t think so. Aaron Swirski, a World Trade Center architect, says that the buildings were designed for similar eventualities."
And Wisnewski cites Lee Robertson, the joint owner of the static office that developed the supporting construction for the WTC: "I designed the building for the impact of a Boeing 707." And Robertson took a filled up machine as a starting point for his calculations. In addition the static office announced that the construction would have resisted the wind pressures of a hurricane.
The Boeing 767 that crashed into the WTC is, however, smaller than a Boeing 707. Furthermore, the Boeing 767 was not filled up any circumstances when it hit the tower. Because the American Airlines flight 11 was supposed to go from Boston to Los Angeles, only a third of the possible tank content was filled up. In addition, only a fraction of the amount of kerosene was blown into the towers. The rest evaporated as outside the towers in form of a gigantic fire ball.
So that leads to the justified question of how could the twin towers could actually collapse. The witness reports that speak of a second explosion provide the answer. This obviously happened an hour after the first impact. Only this detonation made the WTC collapse and not the inferno of fire that was the result of the burning kerosene.
That appears far-fetched. But it is true. There are a lot of expert comments which all exclude the possibility of the WTC’s collapse through the fires. The opinion of Van Romero, which he voiced on 11 September towards the Albuquerque Journal, is most interesting. Romero is one of the greatest experts for building detonations. And that on a scientific basis.
His initial judgment concerning the WTC’s collapse is unambiguous: Television pictures of the WTC attacks confirmed that explosives caused the collapse of the twin towers. That was his initial statement. But when the Mexican was later offered a sought after job in a public commission by the President, Romero abruptly revoked his statement 10 days later. This bought change of heart is maybe the strongest argument that the White House was involved in the events of 11 September.
The second explosions are no fantasies, they are real. The television transmitter NBC displayed pictures that prove this contention. And there are observations of spectators who confirm the pictures.
The film shows: Shortly before the WTC collapsed, there was a whitish-gray detonation cloud to be seen on the building in height of the 79th floor, which extended straight and in a horizontal line for more than two thirds of the total breadth. It concisely differed from the black soot clouds that were a result of the blazing flames. Shortly after that a similar cloud appeared a few floors lower.
It was now said that the second detonations were also caused by the terrorists. That contradicts the fact that the whitish dust cloud had an accurate form, therefore could not stem from a bomb deposited at the detonation place. The real cause can only be an exactly drilled sequence of boreholes filled with explosive that is arranged in the blasting level.
These boreholes could have impossibly been created by terrorists. Not only the corresponding know-how would not be necessary for this purpose but the static would also have to be known to the terrorists in order to supply the building’s vulnerable places with explosive charges. In addition they would have needed the occasion to make such blast holes without being noticed. Which was extremely unlikely.
Therefore the WTC collapse was not caused by crashing airplanes. But in spite of that, the airplanes still crashed into the buildings, that is a fact. Who controlled the planes? Certainly not terrorists. At least not those who had already arisen suspicion before the attack. And there were no other ones.
In order to get wise to the true culprit‘s tricks, one must go back to the time of Kennedy’s presidency. At that time, a special maneuver to achieve the own goals was elaborated. It was the Northwood Paper, created during the Cuba crisis.
Although this document had the highest security grade it still became public. According to the instructions, two equally built passenger machines fly towards a meeting place. One above the radar visibility, the other one underneath it. At the meeting place they change positions.
The point of the maneuver is that the machine that first is invisible for the radar and then visible, is crammed with electronics. It is a drone, therefore an airplane that is guided by remote control. Because both airplanes send out the same identification code, the air traffic controllers can not distinguish them.
The drone is detonated at a place where the blame can be put on the adverse party. The other machine lands on a military air base where it releases its passengers. It receives a new identification code and emerges somewhere again as a normal airplane. The Northwood paper was obviously used as an instruction to guide the Boeings into the WTC.
The remaining two attacks belong less into the category of terror acts but more into the column ‘biggest flop of the year’. The amount of credulity that is asked of the audience requires a higher form of dementia. But obviously this ‘thinking impotence’ nevertheless exists, because the deceit worked. Anyway, what happened was a proper second-rate theater.
However, the absurdity that was presented opened the gate to argumentation and disproof for the critics of the official representation. One must not be satisfied with calling the nonsense nonsense, but it has to be certified by experts that it is, in fact, nonsense. Because the modern person is only capable of recognizing a fact as such once experts have blessed it.
What it this about? It is what I want to call the vaporization syndrome. The official representation states simply and naively that the Boeing 757 that crashed into the pentagon vanished into thin air as a result of the fire or detonation. It is supposed that it melted or pulverized when it crashed into the building. Against every physical regularity and any kind of the reason.
For as incredible as it may sound: the lawn at the place of impact kept on existing peacefully and dew glittered on it in front of the dark walls of the pentagon even after the attack. Therefore the Boeing must have squeezed itself, like a contortionist, through relatively small openings into the interior of the building. Then it vaporized there or vanished into thin air. There is no other explanation for this.
One must admit that it requires a great amount of idiotic willingness to follow the official announcement’s abstruse lines of thought. Because one wants to make us believe that matter simply disappeared, which, according to Einstein, is only possible through a transformation into energy. Into a lot of energy. In this case it would have been sufficient to blow up half of America.
But it did not come to that. Because there was mainly military personnel on the plane. In spite of their combat experience and considerable amounts of decorations received for proven courage towards the enemy, they were so afraid of the terrorist’s bright drawn carpet knifes that they forgot their proverbial resoluteness and all shat a brick. It smelled like a predators‘ enclosure, anyways.
Yes, that was the most amazing thing in the infernal spectacle. The terrorists were armed with carpet knifes. Really horrific. Now, war veterans can only be stopped with the aid of submachine guns, at best. A rifle in firing position annoys him at best and provokes him to start fighting. A carpet knife would presumably only make him slide from the bank laughing.
Very cozy telephone calls were made by the passengers of the kidnapped machine with the dear ones at home. It was announced to overwhelm the knife swinging infernal rabble of terrorists and to drill the plane into the landscape. Fabulous! That’s what I call heroism in perfection. Although if I want to say quietly that overwhelming the terrorists would have be sufficient. Maybe they would have even managed a landing then.
The crash in Shanksville was definitely true-blue. To not leave any trace like at the impact in the pentagon. The earth opened up a kind of fissure of about 20 meters into which the airplane fell. Gone! The Boeing was gone. Maybe vaporized in the underground, maybe slid into the magma stratum. A further case of the vaporization syndrome. Physics should reorganize itself!
Before that happened one had not failed to hand out the terrorists’ documents. The authorities had to know who these people on the plane were. Yes, that was astonishing. Although no airplane wreck was discovered. The recordings of the terrorists were found. Quasi flung into the bushes.
Wherever one pokes in the mess of information about the events of the 11 September, everywhere absurd constructions that could not have happened that way come to light. Obviously the vaporization syndrome is not only restricted to the airplanes, but above all to the concerned people’s ability to judge and their love of truth.
What is most frightening about the events of 11 September 2001 is the unrestrained willingness of the people that are involved in the event any way to lie like a trooper. Although it is clear that the purpose of the whole effort is an attack on society. Because from the beginning, the whole aim of the action was to be able to start a war against the terrorists.
One wanted to have a moral justification in order to be able to proceed unrestrainedly against the nations that are associated with terrorism. That all fell into place may be doubted.
Kennedy’s murder and the terror attacks of 11 September are atrocities that must be blamed on the high finance’s insider group. Therefore it only applies to only a minimal part of the American nation. It is different for the many kinds of wars, interventions and combat aids that concern the American nation as a whole.
The crimes are never anywhere as criminal, so vehemently directed against the ethics, as in war or revolutionary rebelling. The general consensus overpowers all individual reservations in a way that even when considering calmly nobody is capable of pursuing a line of ethical actions. One follows the general mass psychosis and still believes that this is quite legal. But: some complicity remains that the individual has to take responsibility for in front of himself and God.
It does not surprise that the US population agreed with the wars against Afghanistan and the Iraq to 90 % at the beginning. Yes they almost identified themselves with the intentions of their president although there was virtually no evidence for the submitted accusations that required the interventions. As long as it was am aerial war, without any losses, it was OK.
When casualties were registered and the list of casualties became longer, the whole thing did not look so bright anymore. What was more was that series of suicides occurred in the troops that can be explained by the permanent fear of becoming the victim of a terrorist ambush. The self-confidence of the occupying forces was destroyed and with that the optimism of the Americans to be able to bring this war adventure to a good end.
And although it came out that the war reasons were made up out of thin air, they did not leave the country. No, because in Afghanistan it was the pipelines that one wanted to control. In Iraq it was the oilfields. This real reason for the war did not disappear in any way. Therefore they did what they always do in such situations - they tortured.
Prisoners were from Afghanistan to Guantanamo in order to realize their sadistic inclinations. With the aid of these demonstrated acts of malice they hoped to be able to demoralize the Islamic fighters. But they were very much mistaken. Because the Islam says that a martyr who dies for Allah immediately and directly receives salvation.
In Iraq one couldn’t even be bothered to take away the people. One tortured them on the spot in Abu Ghraib. When the events were exposed it was the small sadists of the troop that humiliated and tortured the Iraqis naked and in erotic agglomeration of the bodies. And everything was filmed. If one dissociated from it all. The message was clear: if you do not obey, we will ruin you! That had to be shown bluntly by video recording.
The message did not only reach the Iraqis. They were already accustomed to such things though Saddam Hussein. No, the pictures were supposed to bring future opponents to terms, so not to resist a possible American attack. Because the American doctrine for the domination of other nations says: Cause as much damage as possible at all. Spread terror so that they fear you!
America also does not want to abstain from weapons banned by most countries, they include: phosphorus weapons, defoliants, plutonium projectiles, landmines. The foolish Europeans always think these weapons cannot be used because they could hit uninvolved and innocent people – even still after years. But this idea is very inept from an American perspective.
One especially wants to hurt the innocent in a terrorist way. Because the real fighting opponents enjoy some kind of sympathy. That concerns the cliquishness of enmity. These opponents also are subjected to the laws of war. No, if one wants to torture people, then it should be innocent people, also children. Because landmines are dangerous especially for playing children. They can not recognize the diabolic danger that threatens them when entering a mined field.
This fight against innocent people or civilians has a long tradition in the American army. Already in the American Civil War, the army of the northern states let their hordes maraud through the south in order to decide the fight in that way. And then in the Second World War. The atomic attack on Japan and the bombardment of Dresden were the highlights of activities which reach from the 18th century up to now.
And why all that? Malice and meanness are already determining elements in the perverse game. The purpose of all that, however, is the satisfaction of rapacity. It is the unrestrained urge to annex the goods of the world. One took part in the civil wars in China and Chile, was directly involved in the fights in Korea and Vietnam. And recently one has chosen Afghanistan and Iraq to pursue the bloody trade.
The sibyls announce: If America‘s army crosses the border of Iran, they will destroy a big empire.